ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
WHY DO LIVESTOCK NEED TO BE "REUNITED"? THE PET ID SYSTEM AND
THE LIVESTOCK SYSTEM ARE TWO DIFFERENT SYSTEMS AND NEED TO
BE REGULATED DIFFERENTLY.
IF ISO SEEKS TO PROFIT ITSELF, THE U.S. SHOULD DEVELOP ITS OWN
CHEAP SYSTEM FOR ITS OWN USE. PUTTING AMERICANS OVER A
BARREL AND CHARGING THEM MORE FOR ISO USE IS ABSOLUTELY
DISGUSTING AND PERVERTED.
WE NEED ONE SIMPLE CHEAP SYSTEM FOR PET IDENTIFICATION. THERE
SHOULD BE ONE CENTRAL REGISTRY ON THE INTERNET DATABASE.
THERE SHOULD BE ONE PET ID SYSTEM - NOT MULTIPLE.
THE ID SHOULD BE PLACED ON ONE SITE ON THE ANIMAL AND ONLY ONE
SITE.
WE SHOULD CUT OUT ALLOWING RESEARCH FACILITIES TO USE PETS AS
RESEARCH SUBJECTS. ALLOWING THEM TO BE POISONED TO TEST
HUMAN PESTICIDES, ETC. IS ABSOLUTELY DEPRAVED. THIS SYSTEM OF
USING ANIMALS STARTED IN 1500 A.D. AND IT IS TIME TO MOVE TO MORE
MODERN, LESS ABUSIVE SYSTEMS OF TESTING TOXIC CHEMICALS. I DO
NOT WANT ANIMALS USED FOR THIS TESTING ANYMORE.
SHUT OUT ALL CLASS A B AND C DEALERS, WHO DEAL IN ANIMAL ABUSE
AND MISERY. THEY ARE PERVERTED DEGENERATES WHO DEAL IN
TURNING ANIMALS OVER TO LABORATORIES. THIS WHOLE BUSINESS
STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN.
ANIMALS WERE NOT PUT ON THIS EARTH BY GOD SO THAT THEY CAN BE
TORTURED BY GUYS WHO WANT TO ENRICH THEMSELVES BY ANIMAL
ABUSE.
Comment from Barb Sachau
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Animal Welfare; Animal Identification Standards
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 03/13/2006 ID: APHIS-2006-0012-0002
Sep 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/13/2006 ID: APHIS-2006-0012-0003
Sep 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/20/2006 ID: APHIS-2006-0012-0005
Sep 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/20/2006 ID: APHIS-2006-0012-0006
Sep 07,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 03/20/2006 ID: APHIS-2006-0012-0007
Sep 07,2006 11:59 PM ET