Home »
Rulemaking » Comment from Charles H Bronson & Richard D Gaskalla, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS/DPI)
Comment from Charles H Bronson & Richard D Gaskalla, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS/DPI)
Document ID: APHIS-2007-0032-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service
Received Date: May 02 2007, at 05:05 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 3 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 22 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 11 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
May 1, 2007
Regulatory Analysis and Development
PPD, APHIS
Station 3A-03.8
4700 River Road Unit 118
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238
RE: Docket No. APHIS-2007-0032
To Whom It May Concern:
This is to express our objection to the interim rule that became
effective on March 16, 2007, ?Citrus Canker; Interstate Movement of Regulated
Nursery Stock from Quarantine Areas? that prohibits the interstate movement of
citrus nursery stock with a couple of minor exceptions for non-grafted calamondin
and kumquat plants. This interim rule is not in accordance with the National Plant
Board Principles of Plant Quarantine in that USDA is imposing more restrictive
measures than are needed to prevent the spread of citrus canker.
Prior to the implementation of this interim rule, 7 CFR 301.75 permitted
the movement of citrus nursery stock from citrus canker quarantine areas provided
it was not destined to citrus producing areas. It required that every regulated plant
and regulated tree in all nurseries in the quarantine area be inspected for citrus
canker by an inspector at intervals of no more than 45 days. A nursery was
defined as any premise, including greenhouses but excluding any grove, at which
plants were grown or maintained for propagation or replanting. It also required the
treatment upon leaving the grove of personnel, vehicles, equipment and other
articles in the quarantined area that were used in providing inspection,
maintenance, harvesting, or related services in any grove containing regulated
plants or regulated trees. In addition, all personnel who entered the grove or
premises to provide these services had to be treated for purposes of
decontamination.
Docket No. APHIS-2007-0032
May 1, 2007
Page Two
The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division
of Plant Industry (FDACS/DPI) provided the USDA with evidence and information
that these requirements were and could continue to be met. In fact, the
FDACS/DPI had passed new regulations in accordance with the Citrus Health
Response Plan jointly authored by USDA, FDACS, and the Florida Citrus Industry
with input from both the California and Texas Citrus Industries requiring all citrus
nursery stock propagations after January 1, 2007 to be made within structures
approved by FDACS/DPI to prevent the introduction of citrus canker, citrus
greening and the Asian citrus psyllid. They also implemented and fully staffed a
new Citrus Nursery Stock Certification Program wherein citrus nurseries are
inspected every 30 days. Decontamination of both equipment and personnel at
these locations is required and strictly enforced through the inspection process.
Decontamination of equipment and personnel working in groves is also still
required.
The Florida Citrus Nursery Certification Program is the most restrictive
in the United States because Florida has more commercial citrus production than
any other state in the country in need of protection. Certainly this program
provides more than adequate quarantine security for non-citrus producing states
that do not even have a citrus industry. Several Florida citrus nurseries have good
markets in the northeast and other areas east of the Mississippi River but have
now been excluded from these profitable markets. Excluding Florida citrus plants,
which are produced under the most restrictive criteria of any state, will provide
opportunities for citrus nursery stock production in non-citrus producing states
where there are no provisions to ensure clean stock. If citrus canker or citrus
greening were even present in these states, it is highly unlikely it would be
detected due to minimal surveillance activities for citrus pests and diseases. In
addition, if people in non-citrus producing states cannot readily obtain certified
citrus plants from Florida, they will be more likely to obtain non-certified plants
that pose a very real risk of being infected with citrus canker.
This interim rule is overly restrictive, inconsistent with other USDA
regulations governing the movement of nursery stock from areas under quarantine
for exotic pests or diseases, economically detrimental to Florida citrus nurseries
and biologically unjustified. Such deviation from the Principles of Plant Quarantine
is unprecedented, and this interim rule should be repealed.
Sincerely,
CHARLES H. BRONSON
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE
Richard D. Gaskalla
Division Director
RDG/dc
Comment from Charles H Bronson & Richard D Gaskalla, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry (FDACS/DPI)
This is comment on Rule
Citrus Canker; Interstate Movement of Regulated Nursery Stock From Quarantined Areas
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 05/03/2007 ID: APHIS-2007-0032-0002
Jun 11,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/03/2007 ID: APHIS-2007-0032-0003
Jun 11,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/21/2007 ID: APHIS-2007-0032-0006
Jun 11,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/22/2007 ID: APHIS-2007-0032-0008
Jun 11,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 05/22/2007 ID: APHIS-2007-0032-0009
Jun 11,2007 11:59 PM ET