When I look at the summarization of the new rule the following are a few of the
initial questions of many that come to mind:
What is a current Farm level inspection?
What is the difference between protected waters and non-protected waters?
If a grower has their water basin licensed through the State Competent Authority
and the basin is fishless (rotenoned) and spring fed does this constitute protected
waters?
How can a fish farmer that is raising their fish in unprotected waters comply when
it takes no less than 30 days to acquire a VHS test?
How long can a veterinarian hold an inspection report? For example; for farmer’s
that grow their fish in unprotected waters, could they have all of their fish tested on
August 15th, September 15th, October 15th, November 15th, and December 15th.
But then hold (not report) the August test until just prior of commencement of
shipping say on September 20. Would the farmer be in compliance through
January 15th providing the veterinarian sends the new health certificate from the
prior month in as they receive them, and signs and completes the 72 hour
inspection?
Will there be any laws put into place that will provide insurance that the farmer will
receive the health certification in a timely matter. And if there is no checks and
balances for the health testing facilities will there be provisions in the rule to give
the farmer some leniencies if the lab is not timely on the lab tests?
Where must the shipment of fish be visually inspected? Example: at the farm in
the tanks or can they be inspected at the water basin where the fish were grown?
In many cases the fish are shipped the same day or within 12-24 hours of
gathering, so for most farmers to comply with the 72 hour rule they will have to
increase holding capacity as much as 3 times. Will there be any help available to
farmers to provide for larger warehouses, greater water capacity, and water
appropriation permits to increased water usage for the holding facility just to name
a few of the problems and hurdles they will be faced with? Also in many cases
the State Competent Authority may not be willing to appropriate more water for
these farmers what should they do? Can APHIS help these farmers work with the
Authority to help them achieve greater water appropriation?
Are there enough veterinarians that will put their stamp of approval on a visual
check of fish health, much less take a farmers word that he has properly
disinfected his equipment. It seems as though there is some inherent risk to a
veterinarian’s reputation, it concerns me that there will be enough of them to go
around that will sign there name to the health of fish. Has APHIS taken this into
consideration? What if the farmer can not find a vet that will come every day to
their farm to inspect a load of fish, what is the farmer suppose to do then, this will
mean certain death for fish already caught in traps that can't be emptied in a
timely matter the day this happens.
Comment from Mike Lint, West Central Bait & Fisheries
This is comment on Rule
Viral Hemorrhagic Septicemia; Interstate Movement and Import Restrictions on Certain Live Fish
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 09/12/2008 ID: APHIS-2007-0038-0005
Nov 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/16/2008 ID: APHIS-2007-0038-0006
Nov 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/22/2008 ID: APHIS-2007-0038-0007
Nov 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/22/2008 ID: APHIS-2007-0038-0008
Nov 10,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 09/23/2008 ID: APHIS-2007-0038-0009
Nov 10,2008 11:59 PM ET