Comment from Johann Sachs

Document ID: APHIS-2008-0119-0149
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service
Received Date: April 03 2009, at 02:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 6 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 3 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 6 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 809402eb
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth takes this opportunity to bring to the attention of the United States the following concerns regarding the implementation of the revised Lacey Act provisions, as requested by 04/06/2009: Austria supports the U.S objective of the Lacey Act to combat illegal trafficking in wild life, fish and plants and agrees that trade of illegally harvested plants, in particular timber, should be reduced to a minimum. At the same time we are still very concerned about various aspects of the envisaged U.S. measures. These are, as already set out in our previous comments: (a) compatibility with WTO requirements The Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth considers that the system established by the revised Lacey Act provisions would entail asymmetric treatment of imported products and products originating from inside the U.S. It may therefore be discriminatory according to WTO rules. (b) the scope of the revised Lacey Act provisions (proportionality and legal certainty) The revised Lacey Act provisions impose onerous declaration requirements to products covering most of the chapters of the Harmonised Tariff Schedule. Given the increase in the cost of imports and the delays in trade flows that will be brought about by the declaration requirements, the measures should be limited to timber and timber products with a clear and identifiable link to illegal logging. (c) the schedule for phasing-in The Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth welcomes the introduction of a phased-in approach regarding the enforcement of the declaration requirements and the limitation of phase II to 9 sub-headings of HS Chapter 44. We consider, however, that longer phase-in periods (at least nine months per phase) are necessary to allow importers sufficient time to adapt to the new system and to provide the necessary information needed for the declaration. Finally the Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth calls upon the US not to extend the current scope for declaration requirements before the implementation review has taken place. The Austrian Federal Ministry for Economy, Family and Youth hopes that the U.S. authorities will take the above concerns into consideration and trusts that they will take a careful, measured approach, consistent with international obligations, towards implementation of the revised Lacey Act provisions. Best regards Vienna, 03.04.2009 For the Federal Minister: Mag.rer.soc.oec.Mag.iur.DDr.h.c Johann Sachs Signed electronically.

Attachments:

Comment from Johann Sachs

Title:
Comment from Johann Sachs

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 52
Comment from Donald Moffett, Product Integrity Consulting Services
Public Submission    Posted: 03/09/2009     ID: APHIS-2008-0119-0139

Apr 06,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Lisa Sigmon
Public Submission    Posted: 03/09/2009     ID: APHIS-2008-0119-0140

Apr 06,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Phil Gattis
Public Submission    Posted: 03/13/2009     ID: APHIS-2008-0119-0142

Apr 06,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Stefan Przystanski
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2009     ID: APHIS-2008-0119-0145

Apr 06,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Arvind Gupta
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2009     ID: APHIS-2008-0119-0146

Apr 06,2009 11:59 PM ET