Comment from Dan Lundgren Lundgren

Document ID: APHIS-2011-0051-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service
Received Date: July 22 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 22 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 19 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 19 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80ec9951
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I have the following questions regarding the proposed SITC Smuggling Form. 1. There are no directions with the form. No, not every cell is self explanatory. 2. Who is this sent too? 3. If it is sent via email then is Personal Identifiable Information (PII) and issue and should the document be password protected? 4. The name of the form is different than what is actually in the Federal Register. 5. The Federal register says: • Estimate of burden: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.025 hours per response. o However the form says: • The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average .25 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 6. Are the Customs and Border Protection Agriculture Specialists (CBPAS) ever expected to complete this form? If so they still need to complete a Form CBP 191 Release of Information to release the information and the form should also be signed off by at least a Supervisory CBPAS. 7. If the CBPAS are to complete the form, isn’t this information already in the USDA Agriculture Quarantine Activity Database database? 8. If the CBAPS are to complete this then it really needs to be in the USDA Manual for Agriculture Clearance with directions answering all of the above questions. 9. If CBPAS are to complete this, then there is no room for entry numbers, Manufacture Identification or feedback and findings from SITC.

Related Comments

   
Total: 2
Comment from Richard Gaskalla
Public Submission    Posted: 08/09/2011     ID: APHIS-2011-0051-0003

Sep 19,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Dan Lundgren Lundgren
Public Submission    Posted: 07/22/2011     ID: APHIS-2011-0051-0002

Sep 19,2011 11:59 PM ET