Comment from Michael Martin

Document ID: APHIS-2012-0058-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Animal And Plant Health Inspection Service
Received Date: January 30 2013, at 09:39 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 5 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 31 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 30 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-83ee-4jvs
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I have helped draft comments for formal submission by the National Assembly of State Animal Health Officials. However, I want to offer my own personal statement. While I applaud the intent of creating a standard to guide the emerging field of electronic CVIs. This one was developed using the wrong methodology and structure. The result is dysfunctional in a number of ways that will be enumerated in the National Assembly comments. I strongly support the idea of withdrawing the proposed document and immediately starting over using a more inclusive standards development process.

Related Comments

   
Total: 4
Comment from Ron DeHaven
Public Submission    Posted: 02/05/2013     ID: APHIS-2012-0058-0006

Jan 30,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Heather Hirst
Public Submission    Posted: 02/05/2013     ID: APHIS-2012-0058-0003

Jan 30,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Michael Martin
Public Submission    Posted: 02/05/2013     ID: APHIS-2012-0058-0004

Jan 30,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Victor Velez
Public Submission    Posted: 02/05/2013     ID: APHIS-2012-0058-0005

Jan 30,2013 11:59 PM ET