Comment by CGG Veritas

Document ID: BIS-2010-0038-0012
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Bureau Of Industry And Security
Received Date: February 07 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 9 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 9 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 7 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80bdf9a8
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

February 7, 2011 Regulatory Policy Division Bureau of Industry and Security U.S. Department of Commerce Re: RIN 0694–AF03 To whom it may concern: We are pleased to see these significant steps taken towards the Export Control Reform Initiative; unfortunately, we will not be able to take advantage of this latest proposed License Exception Ruling, Strategic Trade Authorization (“STA”) because the bulk of our controlled exports fall under 6A001. ECCN 6A001 or, perhaps 6A001.a.2.a to 6A001.a.2.a.6., remains ineligible for STA because it falls under Tier 1 items; “maintaining a military or intelligence advantage for the U.S.,” and “almost exclusively available from the U.S.” These items, hydrophones, should be moved to Tier 3 for the following reasons. • Hydrophones having similar characteristics and strength are manufactured outside the US, in China, UK, France and Australia, so this technology is not almost exclusive to US. • Because there is such an abundance of foreign made hydrophones, the U.S. would not be at a disadvantage if U.S. manufactured hydrophones for the seismic industry were decontrolled. Another point we’d like to make concerns our position in export and reexport transactions. We are in fact the final end-user of these hydrophones, or towed arrays utilizing hydrophones, and we maintain constant security over these goods. Also please note that these items are only used for civil-end use projects. With that said, items located in 6A001 should be eligible for STA if the end-user and the exporter or reexporter are the same or related entities. Even with the additional requirements necessary for STA, the benefits for our company would still be worth the effort. Kind Regards,

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 38
Comment by Japan Machinery Center for Trade and Investment
Public Submission    Posted: 02/07/2011     ID: BIS-2010-0038-0003

Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment by International Safety Equipment Association
Public Submission    Posted: 02/09/2011     ID: BIS-2010-0038-0009

Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment by American Association of Exporters and Importers
Public Submission    Posted: 02/09/2011     ID: BIS-2010-0038-0010

Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment by CGG Veritas
Public Submission    Posted: 02/09/2011     ID: BIS-2010-0038-0012

Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET
The Boeing Company Comment
Public Submission    Posted: 03/09/2011     ID: BIS-2010-0038-0013

Feb 07,2011 11:59 PM ET