I am opposed to the proposed change in the emergency withdrawal procedure.
But for the action of a Congressional committee having the authority to direct an
emergency withdrawal, the current administration would allow uranium mining
and/or mineral development to descecrate the Grand Canyon's wilderness. The
timing of this regulatory proposal, late in the hour of a lame-duck administration,
makes its birthright even more suspect. This is not a constitutional issue. This is
a last-gasp bit of pork-barrel politics from a presidential administration that doesn't
give a tinker's dam even about America's greatest national parks.
David Wilks Corban
4510 Devon
Houston, Texas 77027
Comment on FR Doc # E8-23823
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Land Withdrawals; Removal of Regulations Covering Emergency Withdrawals
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 10/23/2008 ID: BLM-2008-0007-0002
Oct 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/23/2008 ID: BLM-2008-0007-0005
Oct 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/23/2008 ID: BLM-2008-0007-0006
Oct 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/23/2008 ID: BLM-2008-0007-0007
Oct 27,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/23/2008 ID: BLM-2008-0007-0009
Oct 27,2008 11:59 PM ET