Comment from Alex Pavlak, self

Document ID: BOEM-2011-0053-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Bureau Of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, And Enforcement
Received Date: July 28 2011, at 05:44 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 22 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 12 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 11 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80ecf041
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The draft views offshore wind as if it were as environmentally benign as a bridge. It ignores the fact that the whole point of wind power is to impact the environment, to reduce electric power system emissions. The emission impact is completely ignored. The usual assumption in the literature is that emissions are proportional to power, that is, if wind contributes 1% of the energy it will reduce emissions by 1%. By this method, PJM estimates Maryland offshore wind will reduce emissions by 0.17 lbs CO2/kWh. In reality a little wind saves natural gas, about 0.10 lbsCO2/kWh. Too much wind can cause base load coal plants to cycle and increase emissions There simply is no data from real systems. How can you issue an environmental impact statement that ignores electric power system emissions?

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 61
Comment from Alex Pavlak, self
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2011     ID: BOEM-2011-0053-0004

Aug 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Jason Wood, SMRU Ltd.
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2011     ID: BOEM-2011-0053-0005

Aug 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Stephen Roberts, Mariners Advisory Committee
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2011     ID: BOEM-2011-0053-0006

Aug 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Richard Reis, Conservation Engineering
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2011     ID: BOEM-2011-0053-0007

Aug 11,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Doug Copeland, enXco
Public Submission    Posted: 08/22/2011     ID: BOEM-2011-0053-0008

Aug 11,2011 11:59 PM ET