eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001

Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001

Document ID: CFPB-2011-0039-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Received Date: December 08 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 5 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 5 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 5 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f7e505
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Streamlining Inherited Regulations

View Comment

I think it is rediculous for these frivolous lawsuits to be able to be claimed when the customer has to agree to the fee duirng the transaction. The requirement to have a fee notice sticker on the outside of the ATM is dumb and should be optional at best.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 131
Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 03/05/2012     ID: CFPB-2011-0039-0002

Mar 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 03/05/2012     ID: CFPB-2011-0039-0003

Mar 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 03/05/2012     ID: CFPB-2011-0039-0004

Mar 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 03/05/2012     ID: CFPB-2011-0039-0005

Mar 05,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2011-0039-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 03/05/2012     ID: CFPB-2011-0039-0006

Mar 05,2012 11:59 PM ET