Comment on CFPB-2012-0046-0001

Document ID: CFPB-2012-0046-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Received Date: January 21 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 22 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 17 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 15 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-838k-p8bb
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This comment is excerpted from something I posted on the Consumer Law and Policy Blog at http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2012/12/cfpb-announces-proposed-policy-for-letting-companies-test-disclosure-programs.html: This proposal sounds like a good idea. After all, the companies who deal with consumers directly may know things the Bureau doesn't about how and what to tell consumers. But I wish that the Bureau included in its evaluation criteria that it will also assess whether consumers use the disclosures. Disclosures that clearly convey information but are ignored do consumers little good, and we've had far too many of those (does anyone really know the differnce between a full warranty and a limited warranty under the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, for example?). Maybe that's implicit in testing for consumer understanding, but I would rather see it made explicit.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 19
Comment on CFPB-2012-0046-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 01/22/2013     ID: CFPB-2012-0046-0004

Feb 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2012-0046-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 01/17/2013     ID: CFPB-2012-0046-0003

Feb 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2012-0046-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 02/20/2013     ID: CFPB-2012-0046-0019

Feb 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2012-0046-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 02/20/2013     ID: CFPB-2012-0046-0020

Feb 15,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on CFPB-2012-0046-0001
Public Submission    Posted: 02/14/2013     ID: CFPB-2012-0046-0006

Feb 15,2013 11:59 PM ET