Skilled Nursing facilities cannot afford a reduction in payments that this new
grouping appears to be imposing. The geriatric clients coming in from an acute
hospital stay are extremely volatile ---and indicators of their propensity to 'crash
and burn' include those items that we have looked for in the 'look back' period,
such as IV meds and fluids--those who receive these special treatments require
significantly more nursing care and monitoring than those who do not--We cannot
afford to increase the nurse:patient ratio when it is already too high at roughly 15-
20:1--for our short term Medicare rehab patients!
If SNFs cannot stay solvent, the government will be forced to pay the 100x more
expensive hospital charges to maintain these patients.
Why can't the federal government realize the benefit of skilled nursing facilities
and try to reward our work, rather than make things harder, costing the taxpayers
more money in both the long and short run!
Leave RUGs III alone--leave the MDS 3.0 draft alone and stop spending money on
these ventures that increase the cost, rather than save anything.
Shelley Matthes RN-BC
MN--Individual
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Medicare Program: Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2010, etc.
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 06/02/2009 ID: CMS-2009-0035-0005
Jun 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/02/2009 ID: CMS-2009-0035-0006
Jun 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/02/2009 ID: CMS-2009-0035-0008
Jun 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/02/2009 ID: CMS-2009-0035-0009
Jun 30,2009 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 06/02/2009 ID: CMS-2009-0035-0010
Jun 30,2009 11:59 PM ET