Comment from Nan Hart

Document ID: CNCS-2010-0008-0002
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Corporation For National And Community Service
Received Date: October 26 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 27 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 26 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 27 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80b77d99
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Retired and Senior Volunteer Program Amendments

View Comment

per the regualation: § 2553.103 Who develops the performance measures?(a) An applicant is responsible for developing its own project-specific performance measures. (b) In addition, the Corporation may establish performance measures that will apply to all Corporation-sponsored RSVP projects, which sponsors will be responsible for meeting. I am concerned with the wide open nature of part b. Who and how will these outcomes be determined and if we are all about local needs what if the national needs don't fall in line with what a local community(ies) deems a critical need or issue? This should be optional depending on the circumstances of the specific project and their unique circumstances.

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Comment from Nan Hart
Public Submission    Posted: 10/27/2010     ID: CNCS-2010-0008-0002

Dec 27,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Kristin Slater-Huff
Public Submission    Posted: 11/04/2010     ID: CNCS-2010-0008-0003

Dec 27,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Karen Powell
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2010     ID: CNCS-2010-0008-0004

Dec 27,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from janet zeanah
Public Submission    Posted: 11/09/2010     ID: CNCS-2010-0008-0005

Dec 27,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Ceil Sperzel
Public Submission    Posted: 11/17/2010     ID: CNCS-2010-0008-0006

Dec 27,2010 11:59 PM ET