Comment from Garth Miner

Document ID: CPSC-2010-0018-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission
Received Date: April 06 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 8 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 15 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 14 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80ad1359
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

We think the proposed definition doesn’t clarify a situation that we have found at resort condominiums. It is common for resort condominiums to have a spa pool in each unit. Often the owner only lives in the condo during certain periods of time such as during the ski season. The rest of the time the unit is available for rent by others. The building could easily have more than five rooms (or condo units) for rent or hire and the proprietor of the establishment (the individual condo unit owner) is a resident of the condo but not at the time the condo is for rent or hire. Would those condo units be included as public accommodation facilities under the proposed definition?

Related Comments

   
Total: 3
Comment from Garth Miner
Public Submission    Posted: 04/08/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0018-0003

Apr 14,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Paul Vieira
Public Submission    Posted: 04/30/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0018-0004

Apr 14,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from David Stingl
Public Submission    Posted: 04/30/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0018-0005

Apr 14,2010 11:59 PM ET