Comment from Paul Pennington

Document ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0010
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission
Received Date: November 24 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: November 30 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 22 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 21 2010, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80ba3c5d
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

As a party involved from the inception to the passing of the VGB act we here at PSC have always understood that the design of the Act was to save lives in pools and spas regardless of where those pools or spas were located. We agree wholeheartedly with the CPSC decision to change the interpretive rule to interpret the term “public accommodations facility”.

Attachments:

Comment from Paul Pennington

Title:
Comment from Paul Pennington

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 30
Comment from Emilio Talipan
Public Submission    Posted: 10/27/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0003

Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from James Hayes
Public Submission    Posted: 10/27/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0004

Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Kate Eisinger
Public Submission    Posted: 11/04/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0007

Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Cindy Smith
Public Submission    Posted: 11/16/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0009

Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Paul Pennington
Public Submission    Posted: 11/30/2010     ID: CPSC-2010-0102-0010

Dec 21,2010 11:59 PM ET