Comment from David Lee

Document ID: CPSC-2011-0007-0017
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission
Received Date: March 08 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: March 8 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 16 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 2 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80c033b1
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I believe that Welchol should be exempted from the oral prescription drug requirement. I support my belief because the side effect profile on Welchol is very good and does not warrant the change to the oral prescription drug requirement.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 27
Comment from Anonymous Person
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0007-0002

May 02,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Kelsey Stallard
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0007-0003

May 02,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Marlin Blane
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0007-0005

May 02,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Urvi Patel
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0007-0006

May 02,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment from LAURIE STEGALL
Public Submission    Posted: 02/28/2011     ID: CPSC-2011-0007-0007

May 02,2011 11:59 PM ET