Comment from Darryl Sackmann

Document ID: CPSC-2011-0081-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Consumer Product Safety Commission
Received Date: January 11 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 18 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: November 8 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: January 23 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f92d46
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

As president of a Woodworkers Guild of Western Colorado and represinting the guild I find that Third party testing to be cost prohibitive. Every year starting in 2006 the guild makes about 300 seperate wood toys for distribution at Christmas time to local charities. Toys for Tots and others. If a approved or acceptable MSDS is applicable to the toys we as a group make including any glue or finish why is it necessary to continue with the expense of a third party testing function. This rule will put us out of the toy making process and will effect the local charity organization in a big way. There has to be a better way. How do I become a third party tester and or where do I find a third party tester to determine what the cost would be???

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 22
Comment from Randall Hertzler
Public Submission    Posted: 01/18/2012     ID: CPSC-2011-0081-0002

Jan 23,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Darryl Sackmann
Public Submission    Posted: 01/18/2012     ID: CPSC-2011-0081-0003

Jan 23,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Richard Woldenberg
Public Submission    Posted: 01/18/2012     ID: CPSC-2011-0081-0004

Jan 23,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Sally Kay
Public Submission    Posted: 01/23/2012     ID: CPSC-2011-0081-0006

Jan 23,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment from Winnie Yip
Public Submission    Posted: 01/23/2012     ID: CPSC-2011-0081-0007

Jan 23,2012 11:59 PM ET