Public Comments 2006-D057

Document ID: DARS-2007-0035-0005
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Received Date: May 08 2007, at 12:45 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 8 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 26 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 25 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80237a8e
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This is another rule that serves no purpose other than taking up time and resources. What does "excessive" mean? Nothing! It's an ambiguous term...and ambiguity is in the contractor's favor. The CO should be given the authority to REQUEST this information. But, there should not be a requirement to do so.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 13
Public Comments 2006-D057-S. Legatowicz
Public Submission    Posted: 05/03/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0035-0002

Jun 25,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057
Public Submission    Posted: 05/08/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0035-0005

Jun 25,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-R.Gimon
Public Submission    Posted: 06/21/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0035-0007

Jun 25,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-I. Merson
Public Submission    Posted: 06/21/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0035-0009

Jun 25,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-J. Emery
Public Submission    Posted: 06/21/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0035-0010

Jun 25,2007 11:59 PM ET