Public Comments 2007-D013-S. Lauben

Document ID: DARS-2007-0049-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Received Date: July 03 2007, at 01:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 3 2007, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: July 2 2007, at 01:55 PM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 1 2007, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8025c703
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I am in favor of waiving the DFARS requirement for military parts that are also used in commercial applications. I believe ethics must come from the individual material buyers in the United States thru education of the issues. Why did the DFARS requirement come into existence? What is it’s purpose. Sincerely, Steve Lauben Product Engineer Colonial Han-Dee Spring 95 Valley Street Bristol CT 06010

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 38
Public Comments 2007-D013-R. Preston
Public Submission    Posted: 07/03/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0049-0002

Aug 01,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2007-D013-S. Lauben
Public Submission    Posted: 07/03/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0049-0003

Aug 01,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2007-D013-R. Whitsitt
Public Submission    Posted: 07/10/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0049-0004

Aug 01,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2007-D013-M. Schnorenberg
Public Submission    Posted: 07/20/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0049-0005

Aug 01,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2007-D013-K.Nardone
Public Submission    Posted: 07/23/2007     ID: DARS-2007-0049-0006

Aug 01,2007 11:59 PM ET