Public Comments 2006-D057-J.Garred

Document ID: DARS-2008-0032-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Defense Acquisition Regulations System
Received Date: May 16 2008, at 12:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 16 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 13 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 14 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80676120
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

The following could be worded more clearly: "(3) Use the provision at 252.215-7003, Excessive Pass-Through Charges-- Identification of Subcontract Effort, in solicitations (including task or delivery orders)--" And "(4)(i) Use the clause at 252.215-7004, Excessive Pass-Through Charges, in solicitations and contracts (including task or delivery orders)--" It is unusual to add provisions and clauses to delivery orders and task orders. I presume the intent is to add this to a new task when solicited and the clause to any resulting task order. This would leave some task orders under an existing task order contract exempt from the clause and some it was applicable to. Or is the intent to modify existing task orders? What if an existing task order holder objects to the enclosure? Will that exclude him from further task order awards? More clarification on intent is needed.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 6
Public Comments 2006-D057-K.Sacilotto
Public Submission    Posted: 07/14/2008     ID: DARS-2008-0032-0002

Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-A.Chvotkin
Public Submission    Posted: 07/14/2008     ID: DARS-2008-0032-0003

Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-M.Biggins
Public Submission    Posted: 07/14/2008     ID: DARS-2008-0032-0004

Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-E.Guth
Public Submission    Posted: 07/15/2008     ID: DARS-2008-0032-0005

Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Comments 2006-D057-J.Garred
Public Submission    Posted: 07/16/2008     ID: DARS-2008-0032-0007

Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET