The following could be worded more clearly:
"(3) Use the provision at 252.215-7003, Excessive Pass-Through Charges--
Identification of Subcontract Effort, in solicitations (including task or delivery
orders)--"
And
"(4)(i) Use the clause at 252.215-7004, Excessive Pass-Through Charges, in
solicitations and contracts (including task or delivery orders)--"
It is unusual to add provisions and clauses to delivery orders and task orders. I
presume the intent is to add this to a new task when solicited and the clause to
any resulting task order. This would leave some task orders under an existing
task order contract exempt from the clause and some it was applicable to. Or is
the intent to modify existing task orders? What if an existing task order holder
objects to the enclosure?
Will that exclude him from further task order awards? More clarification on intent
is needed.
Public Comments 2006-D057-J.Garred
This is comment on Rule
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Excessive Pass-Through Charges (DFARS Case 2006-D057)
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 07/14/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0032-0002
Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/14/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0032-0003
Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/14/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0032-0004
Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/15/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0032-0005
Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 07/16/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0032-0007
Jul 14,2008 11:59 PM ET