1. The proposed DFARS paragraph 204.1103(1)(ii)(B) reads,
“If the information in the CCR database is not current, accurate, and complete,
exercise the option or issue the applicable contract modification as soon as
practicable after the contractor has
updated its registration information.”
a. I recommend that this language not be added to the DFARS, except
possibly as described in paragraph b, below.
i. The contracting officer may need to exercise the option or issue the
contract modification before September 30 in order to avoid losing the funds
committed for this action. If the contractor does not provide current, accurate and
complete information about itself in CCR until after September 30, committed
funds will be lost, and needed goods and services will not be acquired, and
needed changes to contracts will not be made.
ii. The requiring activity may need to have service continue without
interruption. Delaying option exercise until after the contractor has updated its
information in CCR may result in the option not being exercised until after the
current contract period has expired. Such a situation would result in a break in
service.
iii. If the contractor has provided good service, and there is an ongoing need
for the service, it would not be prudent to hold off exercising the option just
because the contractor did not update its information in CCR.
b. The proposed language could be added to the DFARS if the following
language (or similar language) were also added:
“If the contracting officer determines in writing that immediate exercise of the
option or issuance of the modification is necessary in order to prevent
(a) Loss of funds due to their imminent expiration; or
(b) A break in performance of required services;
the contracting officer may exercise the option or issue the contract modification
prior to the contractor updating its registration information.”
2. The last sentence of proposed DFARS paragraph 204.1103(2) reads,
“See PGI 204.1103 for additional requirements relating to use of information in the
CCR database.”
The version of DFARS/PGI shown on DPAP’s webpage,
http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html, does not show a
PGI 204.1103.
Unless:
a. There exists a PGI 204.1103, and it does not show on that webpage, or
b. PGI 204.1103 will be created by the time the proposed rule is implemented,
the DFARS text ought not reference a PGI section that does not exist.
Public Comments 2008-D010-J.Rubinstein
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Clarification of Central Contractor Registration and Procurement Instrument Identification Data Requirements (DFARS Case 2008-D010)
View Comment
Attachments:
Public Comments 2008-D010-J. Rubinstein
Title:
Public Comments 2008-D010-J. Rubinstein
Related Comments
Public Submission Posted: 10/23/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0052-0002
Dec 19,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/12/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0052-0003
Dec 19,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/12/2008 ID: DARS-2008-0052-0004
Dec 19,2008 11:59 PM ET