The President, in conjunction with Congress, needs to put interoperable
communications as the number one priority in funding for the ENTIRE country, not
just UASI cities. UASI cities and along the southern border states can't spend
their money as fast as the money is showing up. Interoperable communications
needs not to be politicial, not who has the best radio system, but a system by
which communities and first responders can communicate with each other. All the
efforts at trying to build new system, allocate new frequencies, and charge the
large populated areas of the country to spend money like it's going out of style,
won't get the ENTIRE country interoperable.
You have to look at the country as a hybrid communications system, and the only
way to afford interoperability is to "connect the dots", not build a new picture. Too
many factors come into play, politics, environment, land contours, etc. Find fairly
inexpensive ways using "off the shelf" technology and start fixing the problems.
I'm not an amatuer radio operator, but they have done so many of the things the
government hasn't done, nor first responding agencies. The idea is not to reinvent
the wheel. Buy new radios, analog or digital, postpone P25 (it's too expensive for
the average first responding agency to afford in equipment purchases), if analog
works - then buy analog equipment, the idea is to everyone communicating with
each other, not limiting who can talk to who because of lack of funding to smaller
agencies, cities, and counties throughout the country.
You want a baseline? The Federal government needs to develop their own
baseline before the rest of the country is asked to do so. Safecom wants to lead,
then lead by example - get the federal government interoperable first, then the rest
of us who are already moving toward Level 4 (and will be at this level by Jan 07)
will set the baseline for regions, cities and counties and probably for the
government. Everything can't be decided within the beltway of D.C. - it's not what
is decided within the beltway that is always best for the country.
One last note....There needs to be ONE federal agency in charge of
Interoperability, not several agencies. On the local level, if at the federal level no
one can select one leader to lead the government in achieving interoperability,
then the locals will decide what they want, based on their available funds, and
types of equipment that is available that can talk, no matter if it's non-P25, analog,
digital, microwave, satellite, phones, cell - they don't care as long as they can
push the button on the radio and someone on the other end can hear them and
respond.
Comment submitted by L. Davlin
This is comment on Notice
Science and Technology Directorate, Office of Systems Engineering and Development; SAFECOM Interoperability Baseline Survey
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 02/02/2006 ID: DHS-2005-0051-0005
Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/03/2006 ID: DHS-2005-0051-0007
Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/03/2006 ID: DHS-2005-0051-0008
Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/03/2006 ID: DHS-2005-0051-0009
Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/03/2006 ID: DHS-2005-0051-0011
Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET