Comment submitted by T. Rachfalski

Document ID: DHS-2005-0051-0009
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Homeland Security
Received Date: February 01 2006, at 11:38 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 3 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 19 2005, at 08:26 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 17 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 801244ec
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This comment concerns interoperability from a systems and hardware standpoint (e.g. not spectrum/frequency allocation). There is too much emphasis being placed on purchasing NEW radios, which can be very expensive. The P25 radio standard is helpful, but equipment and solutions already exist RIGHT NOW to provide full, tested, proven, true interoperability between EXISTING HF radios, UHF radios, VHF radios, cell phones, etc. For example, L-3 Communications has a Communications Switch that is already providing total interoperability for the U.S. Coast Guard and Navy TODAY. This solution can tie all types of existing radios together immediately, and includes additional features such as automatic circuit switching and planning, to give the operators/managers full control and flexibility. I suggest SAFECOM continue with its efforts to create necessary standards and guidelines, but at the same time GET EXISTING SOLUTIONS INTO THE PUBLIC'S HANDS NOW. Providing immediate solutions would give the program some proven successes and positive press, while continuing to build the standards needed for long-term management.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 12
Comment submitted by John Johnson, Tennessee Statewide Interoperability Executive Committee
Public Submission    Posted: 02/02/2006     ID: DHS-2005-0051-0005

Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by David R. Webber, Technology Project Lead, Health Resources and Services Administration, NIH and Chair, Oasis Cam TC
Public Submission    Posted: 02/03/2006     ID: DHS-2005-0051-0007

Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by L. Davlin
Public Submission    Posted: 02/03/2006     ID: DHS-2005-0051-0008

Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by T. Rachfalski
Public Submission    Posted: 02/03/2006     ID: DHS-2005-0051-0009

Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. A. Whitney
Public Submission    Posted: 02/03/2006     ID: DHS-2005-0051-0011

Feb 17,2006 11:59 PM ET