Comment Submitted By Anonymous

Document ID: DHS-2006-0059-0004
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Homeland Security
Received Date: December 01 2006, at 03:23 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: December 1 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: October 20 2006, at 09:04 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: December 19 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 801e726a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

This is a clear violation of the letter of the law of the existing Privacy Act of 1974. This is a clear violation of the intent of the Privacy Act of 1974. Setting up a system to scan millions of Americans for things such as this: "Section 5.2: What information is shared and for what purpose? Data obtained from other systems (e.g., ACE, AES, TECS, and NCIC) is used to identify cargo conveyances and travelers at high risk for involvement in terrorist activities or for other statutory violations, such as drug smuggling, counterfeiting, and intellectual property rights infringement.." --is just plain over reach--the slippery slope of improper government data use personified. What does "intellectual property right infringement" have to do with terrorism? So will you deny people the right to fly because the RIAA says they are potential sound file downloaders or have paid extorted fines to them , or because the BSA filed suit for Microsoft saying they are running computers on illegal copies of Windows software? Who lobbied to tuck this gem in there as this has nothing to do with "Homeland Security" and everything to do with expanded police powers not related to same. This is the TIA, illegally re-packaged with the same or worse faults such as no ability to view and correct errors, set up in the "black" with no public input prior to being presented as a completed deal replete with the fear mongering hints that if this is not done, terrorism will have us in our sleep. A monstrous invasion of privacy against the people of this country with the added harm of bowing to the pressures of the lobby groups for the recording and movie corporatations to elevate any supposed "infringement" on their dog bowls to those of an act of terrorism.

Related Comments

   
Total: 3
Comment Submitted by William Hedrick, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
Public Submission    Posted: 10/25/2006     ID: DHS-2006-0059-0002

Dec 19,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted By Joy Carter, Architecture Systems & Technologies
Public Submission    Posted: 11/08/2006     ID: DHS-2006-0059-0003

Dec 19,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted By Anonymous
Public Submission    Posted: 12/01/2006     ID: DHS-2006-0059-0004

Dec 19,2006 11:59 PM ET