I have several clients that are feed mills and also am performing all hazards
mitigation planning throughout southern Minnesota and Northern Wisconsin. One
thing I find in common is the total lack of computer skills among farmers and feed
mill operators. In many areas Internet is evren non-existant. Some of the mills
date back to the 1930's and are operated by sons of sons of farmers that never
attended anything other than high school and maybe a trade school for a short
period of time. Many mills are operated by omnly one or two individuals. In some
mills farmers will mix and load their own supplies. The proposed regulations are
not realistic in terms of the skills and operating processes at many mills. Unless
the government is not only going to provide computers but also training at their
facilities the rules will not be followed. Further to then claim that you will fine them
per day for failure to follow the rules will just put many farmers and feed/fertilizer
mills out of business. They are not operating on that type of margin to either buy
the necessary equipment or provide the training off site to use it. The larger
modern farms, usually corporate farms, and the larger modern feed/fertilizer mills
have the staff and computer skills to follow the rules, but the one size fits all will
not work with family farms and feed mills unless you are intentionally trying to
drive them out of business and rules such as this will. Agriculture operates on a
very slim margin with many farms in debt to survive. Further if you wish for the
farms and mills to use less explosive potential products some one will have to
provide the education to them so that they change. I am sure that with the
knowledge they would change to AN alternatives if they are equal to or less than in
total cost. Total cost you have to look at amount per acre and number of
applications to justify the cost savings. Many farms in both Southern Minnesota
and Northern Wisconsin use propane as fuel for heat and do not have cell phones.
Many family farms are just as large as the corporate farms but with less
resources. I realize that AN in certain mixtures and whether it is coated or
uncoated determines the explosive potential. Many farmers do not care about this
and some have not even heard about this aspect of AN.
Another issue is how AN gets to the Midwest farmers and mills. Most comes up
the Mississippi on uncovered barges where 15% loss is considered excellent. The
first issue you should address is this transport of AN to the mills. Any change in
transport increases costs which in turn has a pyramiding affect all the way to the
consumer of the agricultural products.
I would think that you would address propane useage and anhydrous ammonia
just as you would AN.
Comment Submitted by Norman Arendt
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Secure Handling of Ammonium Nitrate Program
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 10/29/2008 ID: DHS-2008-0076-0002
Dec 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/30/2008 ID: DHS-2008-0076-0003
Dec 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/05/2008 ID: DHS-2008-0076-0004
Dec 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/07/2008 ID: DHS-2008-0076-0007
Dec 29,2008 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/07/2008 ID: DHS-2008-0076-0008
Dec 29,2008 11:59 PM ET