Comment Submitted by Katherine

Document ID: DHS-2011-0030-0008
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Department Of Homeland Security
Received Date: June 03 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 6 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 9 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 8 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80e3bc61
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I oppose this rule change because E Verify will function as a de facto national ID. I agree with Jim Harper of the Cato Institute that a national ID would be disastrous to citizens in the area of privacy and security. "In brief, a national ID would strip us of privacy even faster than is already happening, producing formal dossiers and increased surveillance. A national ID would transfer power en masse from individuals to governments. They would administer our rights by controlling the tools we need to navigate a “papers, please” society. A national ID would also be insecure, as it centralizes and homogenizes information assets (identity data) that are more secure if widely dispersed and heterogeneous."

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 17
Comment Submitted by Michael Ebert
Public Submission    Posted: 06/02/2011     ID: DHS-2011-0030-0002

Jun 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Andrew Graham
Public Submission    Posted: 06/02/2011     ID: DHS-2011-0030-0003

Jun 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Anna D. Green
Public Submission    Posted: 06/03/2011     ID: DHS-2011-0030-0005

Jun 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Patrick L. McClellan
Public Submission    Posted: 06/03/2011     ID: DHS-2011-0030-0006

Jun 08,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment Submitted by Amy Schauland
Public Submission    Posted: 06/03/2011     ID: DHS-2011-0030-0007

Jun 08,2011 11:59 PM ET