Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06454

Document ID: EBSA-2013-0006-0003
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Employee Benefits Security Administration
Received Date: March 21 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 3 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: March 21 2013, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: May 20 2013, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 1jx-84bx-36y5
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Given that the super majority of current insurance contracts are based on start dates and end dates using the first and last date of the month it is important to provide a practical method for employers to comply with the 90 day rule. If not you end up with an accounting problem prorating premiums, employee contributions, and COBRA costs. I would suggest at minimum a safe harbor provision for plans that use the first of the month after 60 days as the start date. This would comply with all possible dates during the calendar year except for June 2nd and November 2nd since they are followed by back to back 31 day months. Without this type of adjustment employers would go from 12 entry points a year to 365. This combined with the measurement periods for variable hour employees will cause many companies to drop medical coverage simply because the cost of compliance is too great.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 23
Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06454
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2013     ID: EBSA-2013-0006-0003

May 20,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06454
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2013     ID: EBSA-2013-0006-0002

May 20,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06454
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2013     ID: EBSA-2013-0006-0005

May 20,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06454
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2013     ID: EBSA-2013-0006-0004

May 20,2013 11:59 PM ET
Comment on FR Doc # 2013-06454
Public Submission    Posted: 04/03/2013     ID: EBSA-2013-0006-0006

May 20,2013 11:59 PM ET