Comment supports DOE's effort to develop efficiency standards for dry-type transformers wherein there is the most to gain, and encourage DOE to exempt liquid filled transformers which appear to have relatively small savings potential.
Title: Comment supports DOE's effort to develop efficiency standards for dry-type transformers wherein there is the most to gain, and encourage DOE to exempt liquid filled transformers which appear to have relatively small savings potential.
2001-01-12 Submitter Information
This is comment on Proposed Rule
2000-12-01 Energy Conservation Standards for Distribution Transformers: Proposed Rule; Notice of extension of comment period. (65FR75196)
View Comment
Attachments:
Comment supports DOE's effort to develop efficiency standards for dry-type transformers wherein there is the most to gain, and encourage DOE to exempt liquid filled transformers which appear to have relatively small savings potential.
Title:
Comment supports DOE's effort to develop efficiency standards for dry-type transformers wherein there is the most to gain, and encourage DOE to exempt liquid filled transformers which appear to have relatively small savings potential.
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/05/2011 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0099-0031
Public Submission Posted: 12/05/2011 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0099-0032
Public Submission Posted: 12/05/2011 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0099-0034
Public Submission Posted: 12/05/2011 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0099-0035
Public Submission Posted: 12/05/2011 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0099-0036