Comment urges DOE to look at the economic justification of a standard that regulates both AFUE and fan efficiency and in a way that treats the primary benefits accurately,
Title: Comment urges DOE to look at the economic justification of a standard that regulates both AFUE and fan efficiency and in a way that treats the primary benefits accurately,
2004-11-08 Submitter Information
This is comment on Proposed Rule
2004-07-29 Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Furnaces and Boilers; Advance notice of proposed rulemaking, public meeting and webcast.
View Comment
Attachments:
Comment urges DOE to look at the economic justification of a standard that regulates both AFUE and fan efficiency and in a way that treats the primary benefits accurately,
Title:
Comment urges DOE to look at the economic justification of a standard that regulates both AFUE and fan efficiency and in a way that treats the primary benefits accurately,
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0102-0101
Nov 10,2004 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0102-0103
Nov 10,2004 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0102-0104
Nov 10,2004 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0102-0106
Nov 10,2004 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2012 ID: EERE-2006-STD-0102-0107
Nov 10,2004 11:59 PM ET