Comment states that DOE needs to withdraw the proposed DFR and proceed with an updated analysis under the NOPR, because of the identified questions and concerns in the DOE determination of relevant parties and the likely negative life cycle cost and extra ordinary consumer paybacks.
Title: Comment states that DOE needs to withdraw the proposed DFR and proceed with an updated analysis under the NOPR, because of the identified questions and concerns in the DOE determination of relevant parties and the likely negative life cycle cost and extra ordinary consumer paybacks.
2011-08-09 Submitter Information
This is comment on Rule
2011-04-21 Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Clothes Dryers and Room Air Conditioners; Direct final rule.
View Comment
Attachments:
AGL Resources Cover Letter
Title:
AGL Resources Cover Letter
Comment states that DOE needs to withdraw the proposed DFR and proceed with an updated analysis under the NOPR, because of the identified questions and concerns in the DOE determination of relevant parties and the likely negative life cycle cost and extra ordinary consumer paybacks.
Title:
Comment states that DOE needs to withdraw the proposed DFR and proceed with an updated analysis under the NOPR, because of the identified questions and concerns in the DOE determination of relevant parties and the likely negative life cycle cost and extra ordinary consumer paybacks.
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 08/09/2011 ID: EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010-0059
Aug 09,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/09/2011 ID: EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010-0060
Aug 09,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/09/2011 ID: EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010-0061
Aug 09,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/10/2011 ID: EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010-0062
Aug 09,2011 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 08/10/2011 ID: EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010-0063
Aug 09,2011 11:59 PM ET