eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » 2012-07-16 Response to NOPR recommending that DOE revise its cost effectiveness analysis to support higher CSL’s for the product classes 2‐6.

2012-07-16 Response to NOPR recommending that DOE revise its cost effectiveness analysis to support higher CSL’s for the product classes 2‐6.

Document ID: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005-0158
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Energy Efficiency And Renewable Energy Office
Received Date: July 16 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: July 17 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 29 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 16 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8109d020
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

See attached

Attachments:

Coverletter

Title:
Coverletter

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Nickel Comment letter

Title:
Nickel Comment letter

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 10
2012-07-10 Response to published NOPR.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/17/2012     ID: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005-0156

Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-07-13 Response to published NOPR.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/17/2012     ID: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005-0157

Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-07-16 Response to NOPR recommending that DOE revise its cost effectiveness analysis to support higher CSL’s for the product classes 2‐6.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/17/2012     ID: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005-0158

Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-07-16 Response to NOPR urging DOE consideration of important issues.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/17/2012     ID: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005-0160

Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-07-16 Joint response to NOPR recommending swift action to finalize the battery charger standards for product classes 2 through 4.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/17/2012     ID: EERE-2008-BT-STD-0005-0161

Jul 16,2012 11:59 PM ET