2012-04-16 Comment response to the SNOPR, and to SNOPR questions.

Document ID: EERE-2011-BT-STD-0048-0015
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Energy Efficiency And Renewable Energy Office
Received Date: April 16 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: April 16 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 14 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: April 16 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80ff173a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments:

2012-04-16 Whirlpool Comment

Title:
2012-04-16 Whirlpool Comment

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
2012-03-12 Comment concluding that the proposed rule is not economically justified or technologically feasible.
Public Submission    Posted: 03/19/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-STD-0048-0010

Apr 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-04-16 Comment response to the SNOPR, and to SNOPR questions.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/16/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-STD-0048-0015

Apr 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-04-16 Joint comment response to the SNOPR supporting proposed rule.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/17/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-STD-0048-0017

Apr 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-04-16 Comment, received after comment close date, stating that DOE should recognize the differences between countertop and over-the-range MWOs, and not impose standby energy requirements that reduce consumer utility.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/23/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-STD-0048-0019

Apr 16,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-04-16 Comment including recommendations that DOE should set a “no standard standard” for combination ovens; differences between countertop and over-the-range microwave ovens should not be ignored, and the applicability of the proposed standards to products using both microwave energy and radiant heating be clarified.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/17/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-STD-0048-0016

Apr 16,2012 11:59 PM ET