2012-06-01 Comment response to issues as requested by DOE.

Document ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024-0035
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Energy Efficiency And Renewable Energy Office
Received Date: June 01 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 4 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 31 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: July 2 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 81024df1
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Regarding Docket EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024 IV. Public Participation B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment (p49-50): 1. Pre-approval process for AEDMs - No comment 2. Expand use or AEDMs - Agree that use of AEDMs should be expanded to other products, specifically WICF refrigeration systems. 3. Number of basic models, simulation tool development - Recommend one random sample per product family provided models retain linear relationship regarding performance. Simulation tools are typically developed based on input of variable data acquired and shown to historically impact performance (door use, ambient temperature, product load, etc.) 4. Overall and individual tolerance levels - Agree with proposed +/- 5% provided testing is conducted under regulated utility supply to match (typical electric utility tolerance is +/- 10% which will impact performance). 5. Selection and number of basic models - Recommend that basic models be grouped based on linear performance relationship, with a minimum of one each / maximum three each samples for validation if necessary. 6.Course of action and time to complete for failure to meet certified rating - Will DOE be conducting audit/tests and will they be random or only when prompted by non-compliance? Recommend quarantine of identified non-complying product but allowance for production of like models in compliance to continue contingent upon verification of corrective actions. 7. Disallowance of AEDM for willful mis-rating or multiple non-compliance issues - Agree that AEDM be disallowed for willful mis-use but only to the extent of the manufacturer in question. 8. Necessity of re-substantiation - Agree that re-substantiation be required only if such change directly impacts collection or calculation methods and/or modeling of energy consumption data.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 30
2012-06-01 Comment response to issues as requested by DOE.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/04/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024-0035

Jul 02,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-06-12 Comment response with revisions to Energy Efficiency Enforcement Regulations
Public Submission    Posted: 06/13/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024-0038

Jul 02,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-06-25 Response to NOPR request for comments, with additional discussion on issues.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/25/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024-0040

Jul 02,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-06-27 Response to NOPR identified issues for AEDMs.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/29/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024-0041

Jul 02,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-06-28 Comment response to NOPR identified issues for AEDMs, including additional discussion.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/29/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024-0043

Jul 02,2012 11:59 PM ET