eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Comment response to NOPR on rated lifetime and other issues.

Comment response to NOPR on rated lifetime and other issues.

Document ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0071-0013
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Energy Efficiency And Renewable Energy Office
Received Date: June 22 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 25 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: April 9 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 25 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8105f3dc
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments:

20120622 Radcliffe Advisors Comment

Title:
20120622 Radcliffe Advisors Comment

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 12
2012-04-16 Comment response to the NOPR stating that the rule should be accepted as proposed.
Public Submission    Posted: 04/17/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0071-0003

Jun 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment expressing concern that the upper limit of 25,000 hours is premature
Public Submission    Posted: 06/01/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0071-0008

Jun 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-06-19 Comment response to the NOPR concerning lumen depreciation and caps.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/20/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0071-0011

Jun 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
2012-06-20 Comment response to the proposed rulemaking discussing air movement, lamp orientation, multiple modes of operation, etc.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/20/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0071-0012

Jun 25,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment response to NOPR on rated lifetime and other issues.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/25/2012     ID: EERE-2011-BT-TP-0071-0013

Jun 25,2012 11:59 PM ET