Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0992-0007
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 16 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 19 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 15 2010, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 16 2011, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80bcbd8a
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

G. Proposed 34-Hour Restart 1. Would a driver still be able to use a 34-hour restart of the 60/70 hour weekly on-duty limit? I hope you don't change to this, it's a bery bad idea I drive a truck and most of the times its better to drive into the city early in the morning before the trafic rush to pick-up or deliver. and the time restriction would eliminate this option. also limitng to once a week does not make much sence, because if I'm off duty for 34 hrs I'm well rested and ready to get to work all it does it limits me in resting hrs. epecially in slow season

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 30
Comment submitted by Katherine Krueger, Staff Attorney, Quileute Indian Tribal, Quileute Natural Resources
Public Submission    Posted: 12/20/2010     ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0992-0003

Feb 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Don Greenwaldt, Tidewater Transit
Public Submission    Posted: 01/10/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0992-0004

Feb 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by R. Milligan
Public Submission    Posted: 01/12/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0992-0006

Feb 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 01/19/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0992-0007

Feb 16,2011 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by C. Baasch
Public Submission    Posted: 01/25/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OA-2010-0992-0008

Feb 16,2011 11:59 PM ET