Comment submitted by M. Weniger

As a concerned citizen, I believe the EPA should adopt the "potential emissions trigger." The potential emissions trigger is clearer as to the requirements of when the circumstances under which a change must be considered to have a reasonable possibility of significiantly increasing emissions. It lays out the requirements in a much clearer way than the percentage increase trigger. I think it is also important to require more projects to require recordkeeping and reporting under the reasonable possibility standard. The "percentage increase trigger" would allow more sources of emissions to avoid the reasonoable possibility standard recordkeepeing and reporting requirements. I do not feel the records a source owner currently keep will suffice in the requirements of predicting any potential emissions a source can potentially produce. The EPA should require more projects to comply with their recordkeeping standards so that projects are held accountable for any emissions they produce. Should the percentage increase trigger option be adopted, the percentage of increase that would trigger the recordkeeping requirement should be as strict as possible in order to avoid the prevention of significant deterioration.