Comment submitted by Abhishek (no surname provided)

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021-0036
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: May 27 2006, at 07:43 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: May 31 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: May 1 2006, at 08:30 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: June 30 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8017c16c
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I think this is an important rule which is over due but it must be more explainative.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 13
Comment submitted by Abhishek (no surname provided)
Public Submission    Posted: 05/31/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021-0036

Jun 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Rich Raiders, Environment and Sustainable Development Department, Arkema, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 06/30/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021-0038

Jun 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Matthew Todd, American Petroleum Institute (API)
Public Submission    Posted:     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021-0039

Jun 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by W. H. Lane
Public Submission    Posted: 07/03/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021-0040

Jun 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Leslie Sue Ritts, Counsel, National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Project (NEDA/CAP)
Public Submission    Posted: 07/03/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0021-0041

Jun 30,2006 11:59 PM ET