ADEM is submitting comments on the fourth issue under reconsideration by
EPA. This issue relates to the inclusion of the State of Florida in the CAIR region
for ozone. ADEM believes that the State of Florida should be included in the CAIR
region for ozone in addition to fine particles.
The basis for the Florida petitioners? argument for the state of Florida to be
excluded from the CAIR Region for ozone stems from both the lack of adequate
notice that Florida would be found a significant contributor and the lack of
opportunity to comment on the modeling inputs that resulted in such a
determination. While it is true that Florida was not indicated as a significant
contributor for ozone in the proposed rule or the supplemental proposal, the
implications of the notice of additional data availability were such that the entire
modeling platform changed (i.e. new model, new meteorology, updated emissions,
etc). The notice of additional data availability documents were placed on the
docket on or about July 27, 2004 and 30-day comment period was allowed. Many
of the details from the proposed rules changed in the final rule as well (i.e. EGUs
only, first phase of NOx begins in 2009, compliance supplement pool added for
annual NOx). Current modeling indicates that Florida is a significant contributor to
8-hour ozone in Fulton County, Georgia. Florida?s contribution is more significant
than three other states (West Virginia, Virginia, and Mississippi).
Also, the CAIR ozone season trading system would be made less robust by the
exclusion of Florida. Without an emissions cap, Florida sources that would be
subject to the CAIR for ozone would not be required to purchase allowances if
CAIR emissions levels are exceeded. Even if NOx emissions from Florida sources
that would be subject to CAIR do not significantly contribute to downwind ozone
nonattainment, these NOx emissions would not be subject to an emissions cap
as is the case for sources located in neighboring states that are subject to CAIR.
The lack of an emissions cap on Florida sources that would be subject to CAIR for
ozone may impede the ability of neighboring states to meet and maintain the 8-
hour ozone NAAQS.
Comment submitted by Alabama Departmenf of Environmental Management (ADEM)
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Rule To Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone (Clean Air Interstate Rule): Reconsideration
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/06/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0053-2265
Jan 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/09/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0053-2266
Jan 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/10/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0053-2267
Jan 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/13/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0053-2269
Jan 13,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/17/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0053-2270
Jan 13,2006 11:59 PM ET