Comment submitted by Macquarie Graduate School of Management (MGSM), Macquarie University (Australia)

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161-1048
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: August 19 2009, at 08:22 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: August 20 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: August 17 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: September 25 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80a0ce43
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

Analysis of Biofuels Indirect Land Use Effects Finds the Science Lacking 'Too Diffuse and Subject To Too Many Arbitrary Assumptions To Be Useful for Rule-making.' - Lack of transparency and scientific integrity in Searchinger et al. questioned; - Searchinger et al. paper described as more ideology than science and seeking to put biofuels in worst possible light; - Alternative approaches likely to be more fruitful in genuinely evaluating effects of biofuels grown around the world. A scholarly analysis of the keystone of indirect land use study - Searchinger et al. - found the science fell far short of acceptable scientific standards. Professor John Mathews and Dr. Hao Tan, researchers from Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, undertook an exhaustive analysis of Searchinger et al. which revealed that the framework used was inappropriate in that it started with assumptions as to diversion of grain to ethanol production in the U.S. but then extrapolated these to parts of the world, such as sugarcane growing in Brazil, which are actually (much) more bio-efficient. Mssrs. Mathews and Tan's analysis concluded that Searchinger et al. failed sound scientific standards on many fronts and that government agencies relying on Searchinger et al. findings for evaluating biofuels would be better served by utilizing other controls. "Indirect land use change effects are too diffuse and subject to too many arbitrary assumptions to be useful for rule-making," stated Professor Mathews. "The use of direct and controllable measures such as building statements of origin or biofuels into the contracts that regulate the sale of such commodities would secure better results." The issue is where to draw the boundary for life cycle analysis and how to address ILUC effects within the boundary. Non-industry experts are concerned that this is taking regulatory action too far, and the science underpinning such actions, including the ILUC calculat

Attachments:

Comment attachment submitted by Macquarie Graduate School of Management (MGSM), Macquarie University (Australia)

Title:
Comment attachment submitted by Macquarie Graduate School of Management (MGSM), Macquarie University (Australia)

Abstract:
Biofuels and indirect land use change effects: the debate continues. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining (April 2009): BBB147.indd 1-BBB147.indd 13. This document is copyrighted and may not be reproduced without the consent of the copyright holder.

View Attachment: View as format pdf

Original copyright document for attachment OAR-2005-0161-1048.1 Analysis of Biofuels Indirect Land Use John A. Matthewst MGSM (Australia)

Title:
Original copyright document for attachment OAR-2005-0161-1048.1 Analysis of Biofuels Indirect Land Use John A. Matthewst MGSM (Australia)

Abstract:
This document can be viewed at the USEPA Docket Center Public Reading Room. Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW Room 3334 Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744 Fax: 202-566-9744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov

View Attachment:

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 29
Comment submitted by Macquarie Graduate School of Management (MGSM), Macquarie University (Australia)
Public Submission    Posted: 08/20/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161-1048

Sep 25,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Ryan Pederson, President, Northern Canola Growers Association (NCGA)
Public Submission    Posted: 09/17/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161-1988

Sep 25,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Shawne McGibbon, Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy
Public Submission    Posted: 09/25/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161-2105

Sep 25,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Mark Maslyn, American Farm Bureau Federation
Public Submission    Posted: 09/28/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161-2150

Sep 25,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Steve Anderson, Minnesota Coalition for Ethanol
Public Submission    Posted: 09/29/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161-2152

Sep 25,2009 11:59 PM ET