The following areas need to be clarified:
1. Does the monitoring of valves for 2 successive months following a leak include
the reading that demonstrated that the leak was fixed?
2. The calculation of % leakers need to be consistent with the CAR (40 CFR Part
65). The calculation of the percentage leaking components should explicity
handle the following situations:
? Out of service valves (temporary or permanent)
? Difficult to Monitor valves
? Unsafe to Monitor valves
? Heavy Liquid, non-VOC, and vacuum service valves
? Valves on Delay of Repair
? AVO potential leaks that were either repaired or confirmed below leak definition
? Duplicate leak determinations on the same valve (within the monitoring period)
3. The list in 40 CFR 60.486(e)(2)(ii) does not need to be signed by an operator.
A designated tag in the database should be sufficient.
Anonymous comment
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in the Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Industry; Standards of Performance for Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 01/09/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699-0050
Feb 08,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/09/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699-0055
Feb 08,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/09/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699-0056
Feb 08,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/12/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699-0057
Feb 08,2007 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/12/2007 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0699-0059
Feb 08,2007 11:59 PM ET