eLaws | eCases | United States Code | Federal Courts |
Home » Rulemaking » Anonymous public comment

Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877-0056
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: June 16 2008, at 08:38 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: June 17 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: June 16 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: August 15 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80629df1
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

NSPS is not fair. The employees will never see the raise for good performance they are promised. That money will just go away or be split between a few individuals and not be fairly distributed to all employees. Favoritism will come back in to play.

Related Comments

   
Total: 5
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 06/17/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877-0056

Aug 15,2008 11:59 PM ET
Email. M. Pelan, Lafarge North America to K. Barnett, USEPA. New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) Issues
Public Submission    Posted: 10/08/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877-0078

Aug 15,2008 11:59 PM ET
Letter. A. O'hare, Portland Cement Association (PCA) to K. Barnett, USEPA. Request for Comment Period Extension
Public Submission    Posted: 10/15/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877-0079

Aug 15,2008 11:59 PM ET
Email. R. Brower, Zephry Environmental Corporation to K. Barnett USEPA. Comments on Proposed New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) Amendments
Public Submission    Posted: 10/15/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877-0081

Aug 15,2008 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Kevin Batchelder, EnviroLogix, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 07/10/2008     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877-0057

Aug 15,2008 11:59 PM ET