Comment submitted by Joe Smydo, Langeloth Metallurgical Company

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0154-0050
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: October 15 2008, at 02:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Date Posted: October 15 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: September 15 2008, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: October 15 2008, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8075e8ff
View Document:

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Revision of Source Category List for Standards Under Section 112(k) of the Clean Air Act; and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Ferroalloys Production Facilities

View Comment

Comments on Proposed Rule contained in 40CFR Part 63 63.11526 (a) Please clarify the EPA reference Method to be used for this requirement. 63.11526 (b) Please clarify the EPA reference Method to be used for this requirement. §63.11527 (a) In reference to daily monitoring, add phrase "when source is operating" to clarify that source need not be monitored on days when it is not operating. General #1: I was always under the impression the Method 9 was for stacks, and that Method 22 was for buildings and other fugitives. This seems to have them reversed. General #2: Full blown stack testing is not required by this rule. Langeloth only operates 3 hours per day 5 days per week. Regards, Joe

Related Comments

View All

Total: 6

Comment submitted by E. Hogan
Public Submission Posted: 10/14/2008 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0154-0046