Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0310
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: January 18 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 19 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 20 2011, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 3 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80f9a55d
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

I attended the meeting in Bay City. I did not hear any "real" evidence preseented. we spoke about 3 meter stations, yet the graphs appeared to include TCEQ meters that are not applicable for use in this data per the TCEQ website. this appears to be a case of gov't ramrodding things down our throats in order to justify thier own jobs. why isn't an economic study required. why aren't test meters for more acurate data of source pollution required. welcome to the enviromental IRS- another bad idea.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 211
Comment submitted by E. Aleman
Public Submission    Posted: 12/28/2011     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0279

Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by P. Riley
Public Submission    Posted: 01/05/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0280

Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Joseph G. Costello, Executive Director, Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)
Public Submission    Posted:     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0281

Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Meg Klinkow Hartmann, Library Director, South Holland Public Library
Public Submission    Posted: 01/05/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0282

Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by M. Warren
Public Submission    Posted: 01/05/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0283

Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET