I attended the meeting in Bay City. I did not hear any "real" evidence preseented. we spoke about 3 meter stations, yet the graphs appeared to include TCEQ meters that are not applicable for use in this data per the TCEQ website. this appears to be a case of gov't ramrodding things down our throats in order to justify thier own jobs. why isn't an economic study required. why aren't test meters for more acurate data of source pollution required.
welcome to the enviromental IRS- another bad idea.
Anonymous public comment
This is comment on Notice
EPA Responses to State and Tribal 2008 Ozone Designation Recommendations: Availability and Public Comment Period
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/28/2011 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0279
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/05/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0280
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0281
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/05/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0282
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/05/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0476-0283
Feb 03,2012 11:59 PM ET