Comment submitted by J. F. Jarrett

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114-0011
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: February 07 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 8 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: January 9 2012, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 9 2012, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 80fafe2a
View Document:  View as format xml

This is comment on Proposed Rule

Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations

View Comment

Page 1133 Section Q - Method 1 states "The test for the presence or absence of cyclonic flow would be required for all tests instead of recommended at sites suspected of having cyclonic flow." Are cyclonic flow checks now required on rectangular stacks? Page 11 Section FF. - Method 7E states "A statement noting that the stratification test is not required at sources with temporally varying emissions" Could you provide clarification? If the source's emissions are temporarily varying why not wait and test when the emissions are stable?

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 39
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 01/17/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114-0004

Mar 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Wayne Stollings, President, Triangle Environmental Services, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 01/24/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114-0005

Mar 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Byron Nelson, Southern Environmental Sciences, Inc.
Public Submission    Posted: 01/31/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114-0009

Mar 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by J. F. Jarrett
Public Submission    Posted: 02/08/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114-0011

Mar 09,2012 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 02/08/2012     ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114-0012

Mar 09,2012 11:59 PM ET