METHYL BROMIDE IS NOT CRITICAL AFTER 24 YEARS OF NOTICE THAT IT WAS BEING PHASED OUT BECAUSE IT HAS CATASTROPHIC IMPACTS ON EARTH. I DO NOT BELIEVE THERE IS ANY NEED TO KEEP ISSUING EXEMPTIONS. THE PROFITEERS WILL NEVER CHANGE WHEN YOU MAKE IT SO EASY FOR THEM TO CONTINUE TO POLLUTE. IT IS TIME TO TAKE AWAY ALL EXEMPTIONS. AMERICANS CAN LIVE WITH THE ALLEGED MARKET "DISRUPTION". THERE SHOULD BE NO ALLOTMENT FOR SE REGION. CALIFORNIA AHOULS HAVE TO PRODUCE A SCHEDULE TO PHASE OUT TO ZERO IN 5 YEARS. ITS TIME TO PUT UP OR SHUT UP ABOUT THERE BEING A BAN. I DO NOT BELIEVE EPA SHOULD BE SPENDING TIME FINDING OTHER HERBICIDES. IT IS THE JOB OF THE PROFITEERS TO FIND OTHER TOXIC CHEMICALS TO USE INSTEAD, NOT EPAS JOB TO SPEND TAX DOLLARS ON THIS INDUSTRY. JUST BAN ITS USE. THAT IS WHAT WAS SUPPOSED TO HAPPEN HERE.
Comment submitted by J. Public
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2013 Critical Use Exemption from the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/20/2012 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0280-0057
Jan 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/09/2013 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0280-0058
Jan 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 02/05/2013 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0280-0064
Jan 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/28/2013 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0280-0059
Jan 28,2013 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/28/2013 ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0280-0060
Jan 28,2013 11:59 PM ET