I oppose these proposed changes to remove the PE certification, even in limited
scenarios, of SPCC plans.
As I understand it, this rule change would allow a non-engineer to engage in the
practice of engineering in violation of nearly all state engineering laws.
Additionally, smaller facilities would be less likely to have the expertise on staff to
self-regulate. How will they ensure that they are in compliance with the EPA
SPCC regulations. Also, many small facilities, if they were not required to use the
expertise of a PE, would not be aware of the SPCC requirements, or would not
implement engineering controls. And without the threat of regulation, many
smaller facilities might be tempted to cut costs and allow their fuel storage
facilities to deteriorate.
I suggest that the EPA not follow through with the implementation of this rule
change.
Anonymous public comment
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan Requirements--Amendments
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/19/2005 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0023
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2005 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0024
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0025
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0026
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0027
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET