Comment submitted by Mikal K. Hendee, MKH Engineering

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0027
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: December 22 2005, at 09:37 AM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: January 3 2006, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: December 12 2005, at 08:51 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: February 10 2006, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 800fed0d
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

SPCC plans are an engineering function that require the use of experience and autonomous judgement. Allowing small facilities and contractors to make a judgment concerning the integrity and safety of their own facilities would allow a non-engineer to engage in the practice of engineering in violation of nearly all state engineering laws. Furthermore, it sets the precedent for a conflict of interest. If the EPA were to adopt a rule to exempt small facilities from the PE certification requirement, the federal government, by administrative fiat, would be overriding the engineering licensing laws of the 50 states. Smaller facilities would be less likely to have the expertise on staff to self-regulate to ensure that they are in compliance with the EPA SPCC regulations. Many small facilities, if they were not required to use the expertise of a PE, would not be aware of the SPPC requirements, or would not implement engineering controls. Without the threat of regulation, many smaller facilities might be tempted to cut costs and allow their fuel storage facilities to deteriorate.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 142
Comment submitted by M. Aponte
Public Submission    Posted: 12/19/2005     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0023

Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by George Kiernan, U.S. Army Garrison Fort Hamilton, New York
Public Submission    Posted: 12/19/2005     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0024

Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE)
Public Submission    Posted: 01/03/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0025

Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 01/03/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0026

Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by Mikal K. Hendee, MKH Engineering
Public Submission    Posted: 01/03/2006     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0027

Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET