SPCC plans are an engineering function that require the use of experience and
autonomous judgement. Allowing small facilities and contractors to make a
judgment concerning the integrity and safety of their own facilities would allow a
non-engineer to engage in the practice of engineering in violation of nearly all state
engineering laws. Furthermore, it sets the precedent for a conflict of interest. If the
EPA were to adopt a rule to exempt small facilities from the PE certification
requirement, the federal government, by administrative fiat, would be overriding the
engineering licensing laws of the 50 states. Smaller facilities would be less likely
to have the expertise on staff to self-regulate to ensure that they are in compliance
with the EPA SPCC regulations. Many small facilities, if they were not required to
use the expertise of a PE, would not be aware of the SPPC requirements, or
would not implement engineering controls. Without the threat of regulation, many
smaller facilities might be tempted to cut costs and allow their fuel storage
facilities to deteriorate.
Comment submitted by Mikal K. Hendee, MKH Engineering
This is comment on Proposed Rule
Oil Pollution Prevention; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan Requirements--Amendments
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 12/19/2005 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0023
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 12/19/2005 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0024
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0025
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0026
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 01/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2005-0001-0027
Feb 10,2006 11:59 PM ET