Anonymous public comment

Document ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0190
Document Type: Public Submission
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Received Date: February 16 2009, at 08:43 PM Eastern Standard Time
Date Posted: February 19 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Start Date: February 3 2009, at 12:00 AM Eastern Standard Time
Comment Due Date: March 5 2009, at 11:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
Tracking Number: 8085bc07
View Document:  View as format xml

View Comment

90% of produced water that has gone through separation/treatment at the production facility is transferred to a separate facility to be reinjected (57%) or for disposal (36%) (EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0015). There are sufficient amounts of oil recovered at the disposal facilities for states to define this type of oil in their regulations and to impose a severance tax at rates similar to the rates imposed on primary crude. EPA should not create additional confusion by not recognizing standards held by States and a 30 year EPA history.

Related Comments

    View All
Total: 59
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 02/13/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0189

Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Anonymous public comment
Public Submission    Posted: 02/19/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0190

Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by A. Martins
Public Submission    Posted: 02/19/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0191

Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by E. Duffy
Public Submission    Posted: 02/27/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0193

Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET
Comment submitted by David F. Darling, Director, Environmental Affairs, National Paint & Coatings Association
Public Submission    Posted: 02/27/2009     ID: EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584-0194

Mar 05,2009 11:59 PM ET