The removal of the fungicide PCNB would put a financial burden on my golf course
facility. The is a very good fungicide for the prevention of pink and gray snow
mold. The majority of golf course superintendents in the northern portion of the
United States use this fungicide for the same purpose. I use less than the labeled
rate and make sure I stay away from waterways. By having to substitute other
fungicide chemistries instead of using PCNB, my chemical budget will have to
be
increased and this increased cost will have to be passed on to my membership's
dues. By using other chemistries I will also be putting an additional burden on
turfgrass resistence to certain chemicals due to their overuse. We are already
obligated to reduced rates of usage of certain chemicals and this would just put
additonal burdens on complying with that mandate. I would appreciate the EPA to
do further investigation and research testing into PCNB prior to the removal of this
fungicide from the marketplace. Thank you.
Comment submitted by M. Dennison, Christiana CreeK Country Club
This is comment on Notice
Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB) Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED); Extension of Comment Period
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 10/25/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0202-0175
Dec 04,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/25/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0202-0176
Dec 04,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/25/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0202-0177
Dec 04,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/27/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0202-0178
Dec 04,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 10/27/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2004-0202-0179
Dec 04,2006 11:59 PM ET