I am very much against re-registration of carbofuran. I have read that one study showed that
fields sprayed with carbofuran actually had higher weevil population after three years than non-
spray fields due to the fact that it is broad-spectrum and also killed beneficial insects.
I am very much against the re-registration of carbofuran due to its devastating effect on honey
bee population. The EPA owes more to the bee industry and to feral bee colonies than to re-
register carbofuran. The data shows that there has been a "60 percent decline in managed
colonies over the last 50 years and a 90 percent decline of feral colonies over the last 20 years
with pesticide damage a major contributor to these declines." * With numbers like this it would
be highly irresponsible to re-register carbofuran.
Kim Leibbrand
Berthoud, CO
*The Fence Post October 2006
Comment submitted by K. Leibbrand
This is comment on Notice
Carbofuran; Interim Reregistration Eligibility Decision; Extension of Comment Period
View Comment
Related Comments
View AllPublic Submission Posted: 11/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0367
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/03/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0368
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/06/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0369
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/06/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0371
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET
Public Submission Posted: 11/07/2006 ID: EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0162-0373
Nov 30,2006 11:59 PM ET